November 30, 2008 – Celebrations – What they say about us
-with Mary Louise Gerek and Ann Rhody
We nurture the spirit and serve the community
-with Mary Louise Gerek and Ann Rhody
Please bring a fruit or vegetable to place in the cornucopia arrangement on the harvest table in the front of our sanctuary.
-with Reverend Sally Hamlin, Worship Associates Janus Mary Jones, Nancy Gaede, DRE Peg Meeker, and others participating.
the Rev. Mark D. Morrison-Reed speaking
The Apostle Paul experienced his conversion on the road to Damascus, mine came after arriving late in Buffalo, N.Y.
Conversion: a definitive, sometimes overpowering, moment that brings you to embrace a religious faith. What does ‘conversion’ bring to your mind? Does it seem as out of place in a UU environment as an altar call? Have you ever heard a Unitarian Universalist speak of having had a conversion experience? Have you had such an experience? A moment which divides one’s life into before and after; a moment in which there is a spiritual transformation; a shift in one’s inner reality that changes the way one views the world. Such a moment once seized me and I was transformed from a Unitarian into a Universalist.
I was in Buffalo N.Y. at the New York State Convention of Universalists. Donna and I arrived late, slid into a pew and turned our attention to the Rev. Gordon McKeeman who had already begun to deliver the keynote address: “The Persistence of Universalism.”
It was the beginning of our second year of ministry. Donna and I were your co-ministers here in Rochester, but we didn’t know very much about Universalism except what we were learning via osmosis from the members of the congregation. Of course, I’d studied the basics in theological school – how the early church father Origen argued for universal salvation; how in 1780 John Murray helped to organize the first meetinghouse in America, and why some, the Ultra-Universalist were called the “death and glory” school. However, since I had been raised Unitarian in Chicago, the Unitarian ethos rather than Universalism is what had been bred into me. Or so I thought.
The sanctuary in Buffalo with its stained-glass, carved beams, and large choir loft evokes a sense of being sacred space. I sat half-looking, half-listening until McKeeman said “… Universalism came to be called ‘The Gospel of God’s Success,’ the gospel of the larger hope. Picturesquely spoken, the image was that of the last, unrepentant sinner being dragged screaming and kicking into heaven, unable… to resist the power and love of the Almighty.” 1 What a graphic, prosaic picture – the last sinner being dragged, by his collar I imagined, into heaven. What kind of a God was this?
Suddenly what I had learned in seminary and was imbibing from this congregation came together and I got it: This was a religion of radical and overpowering love. Universal Salvation insists that no matter what we do, God so loves us that she will not and cannot consign even a single human individual to eternal damnation. Universal salvation is the consequence of Universal love: the recognition that love is the grounding, the basis of all. Why use the language of love to describe this? How else to describe that which created, under girds and sustains us? How else are we to speak of the idealized parent behind every parent – the archetypal Mother and Father of us all?
Many contemporary Unitarians Universalists dismiss this sentiment.. After all, most of us don’t believe in a personal God much less in God’s love. At most we will cede that the Divine, being synonymous with the natural order, works in and through us. But ours is not a God who talks to you when you are in doubt, rejoices with you when times are good, or carries you through life’s trials. Our God is more abstract and less personal, more a symbol and less a felt presence, more in our heads and less in our hearts, an idea we argue about rather than an intuition we rely upon. In our understanding, caring is not something that flows from God.
A smug elitism bolsters an attitude among too many UU’s who look down on those who believe in God. These “sophisticated cynics” 2 portray God as an all powerful, all-knowing, bearded, white man enthroned in Heaven and then, of course, dismiss him as make-believe. But I grow weary of those who scorn God.
What is God really? God is the unknowable, unfathomable and ineffable that is as close as the next heart beat, as ordinary as a mote of dust and as precious as a newborn. God is the transcendent mystery at the core of all things. God is the mask we place upon the infinite and the garb we drape over the sacred so that we might enter into relationship with it. For we, of all the manifestations of the eternally unfolding creation, are blest to awaken to and knowingly witness and savor this miracle we call life. Then in transmitting and building upon the creation with our own lives, we seek to address the divine mystery that is both parent and partner. We say: “Our Father, Hail Mary, Gaia, Jesus, Abba, Siva, Allah, Brahma.”
One of Elie Wiesels’ stories ends: “God created man because He loves stories.” This is to say God is relational. We say it this way because we find it more believable when we invert reality. God did not make us in Her image. We made Her in ours. Why? So that we can identify with and relate to Her, we can address and be spoken to, can love and be loved by. That is the way we are built. God, which is how we speak of experiencing the mystery behind all things, must be relational because we are relational. The connection we feel to another human being, which is what we learn in our mother’s arms, is the prototype for all our relationships. To the degree that we let the intellectual tyrannize our faith we fail to address this human need for an intimate connection.
I pray. I pray to the God who dwells within, among and beyond us. I pray to God for the same reason I write in my diary, talk to a friend or spend a quiet moment in reflection because what I know of God I find in communion with myself, with those I love and with the world in which I move and breathe and have my being. I talk with God because I need to relate to the world that is within and beyond me. I want to experience its realness and dearness; and UU abstractions of God simply don’t meet my emotional needs or take me to that sacred place.
Even being as analytic as I am at this very moment is to step back and away from the immediate experience of that divine mystery rather than into it. But a God who drags the last unrepentant sinner kicking and screaming – no, actually profanely cursing and resisting – into heaven we can admire, we can have confidence in, we can envision, we can have feelings about, we can even laugh at. It is a personification of the Most Holy rooted in a powerful, sometimes overwhelming, feeling, an experience that transcends description, a yearning that defies analysis. What a relief to feel that ultimately there is nothing I can do to alienate myself from God’s loving embrace – the almighty but tender arms of the creative force that upholds and sustains all life.
The great insight of Universalism is that you do not have to coerce people into loving one another. The commandments are not threats. If they are not fulfilled God will not withdraw His love. No one has ever or will ever draw true love out of another with punishment. God’s love is given to all. Love is a more a positive force for good than fear ever will be. Behind this is a simple truth: in being loved we learn to love. Those who are loved will in turn love others. Those who feel God’s infinite love within themselves will in turn feel so good about themselves, so connected to life and so full of compassion that they will not be able to help themselves but spread that love for they will overflow with it.
This was the feeling that captured me some twenty-eight years ago; this is the belief the world needs today more than ever. The image of the sinner being dragged into heaven transformed how I saw the world because it took my unconscious early experience of being raised and being loved by a family belonging to and embedded in a Unitarian community – and made it paramount. Henceforth I could say: I will make mistakes and fail; I will do thoughtless, hurtful things, and I may be scorned by the world, may be no-good and rotten to the core, may even reject the love that is offered me and still I am beloved by the creation that made us all.
This is the “Gospel of the Larger Hope” the proclamation of God’s enduring and undaunted love. What has always puzzled me is why it didn’t sweep the world? Why after the boom in the first half of the 19th century did it collapse? Why is it the afterthought in Unitarian Universalism? Why is Universalism and its proclamation of unconditional and uncompromising, all-embracing and over-powering Divine Love more difficult to believe in than the Resurrection and the Virgin Birth? Why is it easier to believe the unbelievable than to believe we are one human family beloved by God?
What we yearn for is unconditional love but it is contradicted by our experience. Instead, the principle message each of us received over and over again was this: behave and be loved, behave and be loved. The implication is: those who are good and compliant are loved, all others not. Universalism calls this “partialism.” In other words, people have taken their own experience of conditional, judgmental, imperfect human love and ascribed it to God.
Today when the repercussion of September 11, despite last week’s election, still influences America’s political life. Today given the ongoing strife in Afghanistan and Iraq, the decades old conflict between Israelis and Palestinians, and the genocide in Dafur Universalism is more important than ever. The world needs to know that God’s Love is boundless, but we have retreated from this ancient proclamation. Theism offers religious liberals a language to carry into the world. It is a useful language because it is the vernacular of ordinary people – 85% of the American people. Say, “God is Love” and people will at least have an inkling of what we mean. The world needs to hear about this faith that soothes wounded hearts and shapes attitudes that embody the Spirit of Love rather than that of wrath. In the face of neo-tribalism we need a message that challenges the “axis of evil” rhetoric, contradicts the ‘us’ versus ‘them’ mentality and proclaims the oneness of the human family. There is only ‘us’ beloved by a God who, dismissing free will and embracing the saintly and despicable alike, created both Mother Teresa and Saddam Hussein, supported both Obama and McCain, loves both Bush and Ben Laden, and drags Hitler into heaven, as well. This is a truth almost too shocking for us to assimilate, but “… beneath all our diversity and behind all our differences there is a unity which makes us one and binds us forever together in spite of time and death and the space between the stars. ” 3 It was to the unrelenting tug of this reality, which I know as God, that I gladly submitted that long ago day.
Closing words:
“Let us dedicate ourselves to the proposition that beneath all our diversity and behind all our differences there is a unity which makes us one and binds us forever together in spite of time and death and the space between the stars. Let us pause in silent witness to that Unity…..”“Out beyond ideas of right-doing and wrong-doing there is a luminous field. I’ll meet you there.” 4
©This sermon was written by the Reverend Mark D. Morrison-Reed for the congregation of the First Universalist Church of Rochester, New York and was delivered on November 16, 2008. No part of this sermon may be copied without permission of the author.
-with Reverend Sally Hamlin and Worship Associate David Messner
the Rev. Sally Hamlin speaking
On Friday night, which was Halloween, I made the right turn onto my street after returning from a wedding rehearsal here, hoping to find some trick or treaters still out in my neighborhood. Greeting the little ones, seeing their costumes and handing out candy is something I look forward to all year, and I couldn’t wait to get home. The rehearsal had taken longer than I thought it would- there were over twenty in the bridal party – and it was late, about 7:45. I imagined I had likely missed the revelry. So you can imagine my surprise when I was greeted instead with houses ablaze from every bright porch light and costumed children still running about, from house to house, collecting their sweet treasures.
“Yes!” I said, as I made my way cautiously down the packed street.
I hurried inside and turned on my porch light and awaited the inevitable chant, and dispensed tooth decaying treats until I ran out half an hour later.
This was the kind of Halloween I recalled from my childhood, when hundreds of us would run freely through out neighborhoods until the sacks we carried could no longer be held by our fatigued little arms, and we had to return regretfully home.
In the fifties and early sixties, despite the occasional razor blade in the apple scare, we felt safe within our community and knew almost every inhabitant of each house and without even discussing it, which house to avoid. It was a type of freedom and care-freeness that is rare these days, when you know without a shadow of a doubt, that you are safe and loved by your community. I was reminded of this on Friday evening, and I am reminded of it when I meet with the Caring Committee of this congregation as well.
The Caring Committee of First Universalist is a group of very dedicated individuals who meet over lunch once a month to talk about and plan for how best to care for each of you, their beloved fellow congregants. The Caring Committee are the folks who send cards, deliver holiday flowers, visit you at home or in the hospital, provide you with a ride to church, or prepare food for a congregant’s memorial service. They are a small but mighty committee, and one which needs your help.
I know what you are saying to yourself right now. I can read minds you know! You are saying you are all too busy to join another committee. I hear you loud and clear!
But have I got a deal for you! But you will have to wait to hear about it!
First, back to Halloween for a minute. In planning meetings for worship services for the fall, I had hoped that Halloween would fall on a Sunday. I have an idea for a Halloween service I have been wanting to try for a long time now. I won’t reveal all the details I have planned, but when Halloween does fall on Sunday, we will come to church dressed as our favorite ancestor.
Halloween, however, gives us an opportunity to discuss the Wiccan Sabbat of samhain (sow-en), and its significance for those of us who claim earth-centered traditions as our core spiritual belief. Sunset on Samhain is the beginning of the Celtic New Year. The old year has passed, the harvest has been gathered, cattle and sheep have been brought in from the fields, and the leaves have fallen from the trees. The earth slowly falls towards winter slumber. Samhain is time to honor our ancestors, and if you’ve had a loved one die in the past year, this is the perfect night to celebrate their memory.
But today we are reminded of a holiday – or a holy day in the Christian calendar – that is almost as cool as Halloween: the Feast of All Souls. Let me provide a bit of the history of All Souls, for every holy day has a story that goes along with it.
Around the eighth century or so, the Catholic Church decided to use November 1st as All Saints Day. This was actually a pretty smart move on their part – the local pagans were already celebrating Samhain, so it made sense to claim it an official church holiday. All Saints’ became the festival to honor any saint who didn’t already have a day of his or her own. The mass which was said on All Saints’ was called All Hallowmas. The night before naturally became known as All Hallows Eve, and eventually morphed into what we call Halloween.1
But since the Sabbat of Halloween, the night of the year when it is said that the veil between the living and dead is most permeable, allowing us to visit and celebrate with our ancestors, took place on Friday instead of Sunday, I took another look at the calendar.
And there it was! The feast of All Souls, also called Dia de los Muertos in Mexico….exactly what I was looking for.
All Souls is the day that the Church commemorates and prays for the holy souls in Purgatory who are undergoing purification of their sins before they can enter heaven. The theological beliefs underlying this holy day are that the faithful departed, defined by “those who die in God’s faith and friendship”, are not immediately ready for the reality and goodness of God and heaven, so they must be purged of their sins. The Catholic Church calls this purification of the elect purgatory.
Coincidently, not too long ago, on a UU minister’s chat, I happened upon a conversation about the names of our UU congregations. One minister posted some research she had done, which reviewed the names of over one thousand Unitarian Universalist congregations around the world.2
There are a few UU congregations with names that refer to historical or theological beliefs, such as King’s Chapel, the Church of the Restoration, Church of the Mediator, First Church of Christ, and our oldest Canadian Church, still legally named The Church of the Messiah in Montreal, known more commonly as the Unitarian Church of Montreal.
But here comes the most fascinating part. All Souls is the most common name of our oldest Universalist churches. I counted over twenty of our Unitarian Universalist congregations ‘All Souls’ in their name.
But the relevance of UU congregations named ‘All Souls’ differs greatly from that of our Roman Catholic friends.
For Universalists, the name ‘All Souls’ was chosen to indicate the fervent belief that ALL people would go to heaven, all were welcome there, not just the “saints”, not just the ‘elect’.
This was radical theology for our Universalist ancestors to claim; it was risky, it was bold. It represented the theology of a few individuals who had such great faith and hope that their lives still inspire us today. Their beliefs led them to leave behind their homes and homelands to search for a place where they could worship according to their beliefs, free from persecution or death. Their belief in a loving God who damned no one to hell was the motivation for such risk.
Let me tell you a story about two of our theological ancestors, John Murray and Thomas Potter.
John Murray, an Englishman and minister, was Universalist in his theology, meaning that there was no eternal damnation for any person, that all would go to heaven upon death. However, Murray’s early understanding about damnation still adhered to a Calvinist and Christocentric view of salvation, rather than the Arminian view of universal salvation. (Arminians are our theological ancestors also, but they are part another sermon). Many of Murray’s detractors, including other Universalists, saw Murray as “part of a chaotic and threatening group of rabble-rousers who simply preached an odd version of the emotional religion they opposed. On the other side, many evangelical and Calvinist groups saw the abandonment of doctrines of eternal punishment as invitations to moral degeneracy and possibly damnation.” 3
John Murray is often named as the ‘founder’ of American Universalism, and is named the link between English and American Universalism. According to David Robinson, the American Universalist church, distinctive in its institutional, although not its theological, origins, began when Universalist ideas, merged with a mood of local discontent over orthodox views of eternal damnation.”4
But Murray also believed in the doctrine of the elect, which says that only those who are appointed by God to be saved will be saved, that is until he encountered the teaching of James Relly, who in his paper Union, published in 1759, argued that the death of Christ atoned for all human sin, and, therefore, made “universal salvation not only possible, but a foregone fact”, according to Robinson.
While still in England, a series of tragedies beset poor John Murray, including the deaths of his wife and son. Then he was arrested for debt and served time in debtor’s prison. Upon his release, Murray decided to venture to America, but his cross ocean voyage was miserable. Tossed by a violent Atlantic storm, the ship he was on ran aground, and he was forced to land unplanned at Good-Luck Point, on the coast of New Jersey, at Cranberry Inlet.
There, right in that inlet, unbeknownst to Murray, was a farmer named Thomas Potter, who lived in that coastal town. Potter, a man of great hope and faith, held Universalist beliefs similar to Baptist sects in Rhode Island and New Jersey. But there was no minister to lead this small group of believers in a loving God. Potter, ever faithful, built a small church building and prayed to God to send him a preacher with a distinctive message.5
As fate would have it, Murray’s ship ran aground right in Potter’s inlet. Potter’s prayers were answered.
Potter and Murray struck upon an arrangement that had Murray promise to stay as long as there might be people to preach to. Of course, that is exactly what happened and Murray went on to preach extensively in the colonies, eventually heading to Gloucester Massachusetts where, after some years of struggle against the prevailing orthodox religious opinion and legal struggles to achieve the right to form a dissenting church, his message grew. He eventually moved to Boston, where he remarried and stayed until his death in 1815.6
All Souls in the Christian or Roman Catholic tradition is the day to remember, pray for, and offer requiem masses up for the faithful departed in the state of purification, in the hope that they may be delivered into heaven.
On the Wiccan Sabbat of Samhain, it is the day to honor those who came before us, and to begin the new year.
In the Unitarian Universalist tradition, it is a day to be reminded of our own theological ancestors, such as Thomas Potter, who prayed for someone who would preach a message other than the one of eternal damnation so prominent in early colonial America, the message of a God too loving to damn anyone to hell.
And it is the day to recall the story of John Murray who endured loss and suffering and was willing to travel to unknown shores to escape persecution for his religious beliefs, eventually answering the call of a farmer who had great faith.
The struggles Murray endured and the hope and faith demonstrated by Potter are models for us to emulate on this day called All Souls. It is an appropriate day to recall who it is we are to one another, in all the ways we strive to create the beloved community, in all the ways we strive to live our faith, in faith for what is possible to create in the world if we live as if we believe that all are worthy of Love.
As we remember others who have gone before us in this season when the veil between our worlds is thin, it behooves us to recall that it was our theological ancestors who professed the radical belief that all would be received into heaven upon death. And let us remember today that the belief in a loving God, so central to our early Universalist ancestors’ faith, is revealed in the name of many Unitarian Universalist congregations today who have chosen to retain ‘All Souls’ as part of their congregational identity.
For it is never too late to proclaim the message that all are loved.
And that brings me back to the deal I mentioned earlier. Guess what? You can participate in the holy work of our Caring Committee without coming to any meetings! Yes, it’s true! I am telling the truth! Let me say from this pulpit, that it is possible to be a member of a committee without having to attend any meetings! I have discussed this with the Caring Committee, and they concur, and on their behalf, today, I happily name you each an honorary member of the Caring Committee. Inside your order of service you find a small form upon which you can tell the committee how you can help support the work of caring for one another. If you can provide occasional support of the type mentioned on the insert, they want to know about it.
Now I ask you, where else can you make such a difference in this congregation without having to attend even one meeting! Such a deal! How can you pass this up?
As you leave the sanctuary today, after we have held hands and connected with one another at the end of our service, and after our lovely postlude, you can hand your filled out form to an actual member of the committee, who may call upon your help.
This is the work we are called to on the modern feast of All Souls, UU style. This is what it means to create and live out the 2008 version of salvation for all. This is what it means to have a community where we can wander about, safe and secure, among fellow congregants, distributing and receiving the sweet treasures of the gifts of our hearts ablaze, ones that will not require a visit to the dentist later on!
May it be so. Blessed Be. Amen.
©This sermon was written by Reverend Sally Hamlin for the congregation of the First Universalist Church of Rochester, New York and was delivered on October 19, 2008. No part of this sermon may be copied without permission of the author.
Steve Farrington speaking
“Mi casa es su casa.”
We’ve all heard this phrase before. It’s a saying from the Hispanic world that seems to be so common, or captures a Latin attitude so well, that it’s wormed its way into English like the French expressions “joie de vivre” or “c’est la vie.” Literally, “mi casa es su casa” means, of course “my house is your house.” I like this phrase because I feel that it shows something emblematic of several Latin or Mediterranean Cultures, which are often referred to as “high-context” cultures by experts of cross-cultural communications: a spirit of warmth and generosity that, I feel, we can learn much from. And although many high-context cultures may seem quite traditional, there are many traits that they share with us as progressive Unitarian-Universalists.
I think that many of you here today may be in the same boat as I, if not in terms of spiritual background, then perhaps culturally. My ancestors left to come to the shores of this land because, let’s face it, seventeenth-century Puritan England was just a little too liberal and decadent for them, what with their Will Shakespeares and Christopher Marlowes and such. They wanted to create a “city on a hill” where all things messy and sinful would be, if not totally done away with, at least severely punished and repressed. My protestant forebears were probably a dour and boring bunch, and I really doubt I would have liked spending time with them. According to the Protestant ethic, you were supposed to show you were one of the elect by working hard, being independent and responsible for yourself, and were expected to adhere to a strict morality which made no exceptions. If something was wrong, it was just wrong, and there was very little “wiggle room” or consideration for extenuating circumstances. People were expected to be thrifty, serious, and sober, things that remind me of the ethic I was expected to obey as a Boy Scout during my teenage years. The lack of consideration for context is part of what made theirs a “low-context” culture: what they said, and allowed or forbade—was exactly what they meant. And you can forget about the drumming and African dancing allowed in the Catholic areas to the south. The Protestants of New England, my ancestors and our spiritual forebears, believed such exuberance to be the Devil’s handiwork. And as the Salem Witch Trials and others indicate, even a passing suspicion that one was a moral backslider could be dangerous to one’s health. And, in contrast to high-context cultures, low context cultures tend to have very little tolerance for chaos or anything that seems random or messy. People in low-context cultures seem to believe that they can control themselves and the world, whereas many in other cultures seem more accepting of disorder.
Luckily, I have had the chance to experience many other cultures over the years. I am a Spanish teacher, and am immersed in the Spanish language and Latin Culture almost daily. I’ve had the chance to befriend many people from different parts of the globe. I have studied in Africa, Mexico, and France, and spent lots of time in the Caribbean as well as Spain and Italy. I feel that I have generally escaped the confines of my WASP upbringing. I would like to convey to you a bit of what I think are the best points of some mostly Hispanic cultural patterns, and invite you to decide if some of these are things you too might want to integrate into your own lives.
But, first, let me say that it is not my intention to be overly simplistic about Latin cultures, or to exoticize them. There are many positive things about our own northern-European derived Anglo heritage that I don’t want to disparage, and there are of course many problems and challenges facing the Spanish-speaking world. Yet, despite these shortcomings, I feel that there is much good, and that we have much to teach each other. I tend to think of cultures as people: there are none that are perfect or without their faults, but there are some that seem to resonate the most with me, and tend to reflect my own values more, and hence make me feel most comfortable.
I think the first thing that generally impresses me about Hispanics or Latinos is their human warmth. Friends usually greet each other with a hug or a kiss on the cheek or cheeks, and it’s very common to have a lot of physical closeness and touching throughout a conversation. What can be hard for a lot of North Americans to accept is that, even if someone is being warm and close with you, this doesn’t necessarily mean that the person is interested in you romantically. One of the most touching moments of my life was while I was spending a summer as a graduate student in Burkina Faso, Africa, itself very much a “high-context” culture. When I decided to go for a walk around the neighborhood, the presumably heterosexual brothers of my host-family strolled around the neighborhood holding my hands so I wouldn’t get lost. I could almost hear my Puritan, low-context ancestors whispering in my ear, “don’t get too close. You might be tempted by this human contact.”
This human warmth present in many high-context cultures seems to permeate almost every interaction. Recently, I was hanging out with my Venezuelan friend, Daniel, who commented on something that I’d known instinctively for a while, but hadn’t articulated: that it’s kind of rare to meet Venezuelans who say that they’re in a bad mood. “I guess we do have bad moods,” he mused, “but we don’t really show them if we do.” It’s almost as if, instead of drowning in self-indulgent grumpiness like many do in the northeastern United States, Latinos try to put on a happy face, almost no matter what. To paraphrase A.J. Muste, “there is no way to happiness, Happiness is the way.”
Another great thing about Hispanic cultures is the generosity and hospitality of the people. Once, when in Mexico, I went with a friend to someone’s house during a festival, and I felt completely at home. “Estás en tu casa,” the mother of the family said over and over again the first time she met me. “You are in your home. Eat, eat, you must be hungry. Don’t you want to drink some more horchata?” When I mentioned my desire to return to Mexico soon, she enthusiastically invited me to stay with them again, because I was, to quote her, “en mi casa.” I would have a hard time imagining many people in the United States treating Mexican visitors the same way. In fact, it seems that an ugly part of our North-American Anglo culture is that, simply put, we don’t want to share. We don’t want to share our jobs, our wealth, or our land with others, especially not with those whom we consider the “wrong kind of others,” those who don’t look or talk like we do. It is as if our Puritan ancestors are whispering down through the ages to us, saying things like, “ if they have no wealth, then they’re not worthy of grace or our compassion. Let them suffer for not being like us.” Luckily, Latinos know that the best things in life aren’t things. Warmth, generosity, and kindness matter more to them, and so they don’t tend to fear sharing with others, even if those others don’t look or sound like them.
Recently, Pedro, the janitor in my building at MCC and I have befriended each other. While taking out my garbage one evening, he commented on the music I was playing on my computer, a CD of Afro-Cuban music and Merengue by Elvis Crespo. While standing at my office door, he told me how this music reminded him of his home in the Dominican Republic, and how it made him feel like dancing. Soon, he was dancing to a Caribbean beat every time I saw him, and he was sharing with me memories from the Salsa and Merengue clubs in Santo Domingo, where he played the guira, a Caribbean instrument. Now, we chat every day in Spanish, and he always is offering to help me with whatever I might need. I call him Don Pedro, a title impossible to translate well into English, but is roughly equivalent to “Mister or Sir” Pedro, a way of acknowledging the respect I have for his dignidad or worth, which is important in Hispanic Cultures.
Recently, Pedro brought me a cassette of some music of some of his favorite Merengue songs. I play the tape before almost every Spanish class I teach now, and the students love it. Like I, I see their spirits waking up from the long Puritan slumber in which they were dormant, now able to experience the exuberant music that their ancestors would have surely considered of the Devil. And the positive energy of the gift of this music will live and carry on, as the music may touch the hearts of my students and hopefully make them more curious and tolerant people, and maybe even more happy and centered.
The other night, I accidentally spilled some coffee on the outside of the tape. Luckily, it was unharmed, and it still plays that beautiful, fast-paced Merengue. But, as I contemplated how I could ever tell Pedro that I’d ruined what he had lent me, I realized something important: while many North Americans might become grumpy or angry at such news, or perhaps insist that I replace the damaged possession, Pedro probably would have just shrugged and said something like, “no pasa nada,” or “no big deal.” A Latino would be more likely to recognize that it was an accident, and that the person’s feelings, and the friendship, are more important than the minimal cost or hassle of replacing the damaged object. He would have looked at the context, and seen that it was an accident. And though it has been a couple of weeks now, he has not asked for it back yet. I will give it back to him soon, of course, but am in no rush to do so. And according to the unwritten rules of our friendship, I will be generous and giving to him in return in the future. Thus, Pedro and I have built community around the sharing of music and our common humanity, and have become more interdependent.
This is one of the biggest differences between a low-context culture like ours and a high-context culture: I think that we, as North Americans would be more likely to make our expectations explicit and codified: “You ruined my cassette. You owe me twenty dollars.” Or perhaps, “Hey, it’s been two weeks. Where’s my cassette?” But, if you think about it, how cold this way of communicating really is. The implication behind such words is really, “You will not be warm or giving to me unless I specifically force to you to do so.” How beautiful it would be if, instead, it was assumed that people would care for one another and be kind and generous without being ordered to do so.
Three quick anecdotes, if I may. The first is from Peter House, in a sermon he gave about the Italian-American family into which a close relative married. Peter said that one had to be careful about what one admired in this family’s home, because, in truly generous “high-context” fashion, they would unplug and give away anything their guests liked. I have experienced similar moments too many times to count. It is as if people from high context backgrounds realized that you don’t truly own something until you give it away. We are all connected in a web of generosity and interdependence, and if you are in need today, maybe I will be the one in need tomorrow. Mi casa es su casa.
Another is from when I used to teach in Webster. I worked with many people from Latin backgrounds, and would spend my free periods in the departmental office. The phone in that office was constantly ringing, almost off the hook on some days. “Yeah, ma,” a colleague would say. “Yeah, OK, I’ll pick the kids up from Saint Mary’s later and take ‘em to Maria’s. Yeah, I know, yeah, then I’ll come and take you to the doctor’s before mass. Yeah, I’ll stop at Wegman’s and get a bunch of food for everyone. Yeah, ma, I know, I haven’t heard from Aunty Patty in two days, either. Yeah, I’m worried, too. OK, call me back when you hear something.” As someone from a relatively distant WASP family, I think I’ve always kind of yearned for that kind of closeness and tightness, where the word “familia” means everyone, and often several generations live under one roof. I routinely go months and months without talking to my cousins and Aunts or Uncles, and when I do see them, I sometimes barely get an acknowledgement.
Now, I know that life in a high-context family is not necessarily easy. Many have told me that they find Latin families suffocating, and that, in them, one has very little personal space or autonomy. Perhaps the grass is always greener on the other side of the fence. But I think I’d prefer the suffocating warmth to the isolation of Anglo culture. No wonder so many North Americans are depressed and grumpy or, to borrow a recently-popular title, “bowling alone.” No matter how suffocating Latin families are, I think there are very few Hispanics who find themselves “bowling alone” on a Saturday night.
Once, when I was in Spain, an American I was traveling with expressed frustration with how inefficient things seemed. “And I really hate how there are no grocery stores open on Sundays,” he said. “And the businesses! I saw a sign on a store the other day. It said, “closed for August, we’ve gone to the coast.” He spent a few minutes complaining about how inefficient and unproductive Spain was, and how it was no wonder that Spain’s economy was less dynamic than that of the USA. When I tried pointing out that the quality of life was probably better for the average Spaniard than for the average American, and was doubtless less stressful, he just shrugged and said “I’m way too type-A to ever live here. I think I’d pull my hair out in frustration.”
I think back to how this relates to Pedro. He does work hard, but I think he genuinely enjoys his work, and he takes his time to live, even if this only means dancing and listening to Merengue whenever he gets the chance. And the memories of his Sunny Caribbean home seem to keep him happy enough, as I’ve never seen him in a bad mood.
Now, I know what you’re thinking. Steve, you are a gay, vegetarian, feminist, Unitarian Universalist, and you’re trying to befriend a middle-aged Dominican man. He’s probably straight, Catholic or very religious (it’s true, he DOES mention God quite a bit), and probably has a bunch of that machismo baggage. This friendship could never work.
Well, I hear what you’re thinking. Many people from other cultures follow more traditional life patterns, many of which we might find kind of repressive or at least constricting. Yes, women are expected to take care of the men. Yes, heterosexuality is the more or less enforced rule, machismo is the norm, and they’ll kill and throw in the pot any creature that moves. Who can forget the comical scene in “My Big Fat Greek Wedding” where the horrified Anglo nuclear family watches the extended Greek family roasting a goat over an open fire in their yard?
But let’s take a moment to honor diversity. Let us never allow Political Correctness to become the new manifestation of Puritanism—or its god. Let us not sweat the small stuff. Let us honor the warmth and exuberance of other cultures, even if they are different or don’t look or sound like our culture. As a great humanist once said, “I am a human, so nothing human is alien to me.” There are places that even progressive UU’s can find common ground with people from more traditional cultures.
This is perhaps best expressed in Spanish by a word I’ve already mentioned: la dignidad. This comes from the Latin dignitas, the similar root word of the English word “dignity.” But, in Spanish, just like how “familia” technically means “family” but really includes everyone even remotely related to you, la dignidad has a deeper meaning than what an English-speaker might initially think. This word means that every person has worth and is worthy of great respect and generosity, not only in material things, but also in tolerance and latitude in his or her foibles, and regardless of age. I would actually argue that it’s easier to be quirky or eccentric in a high-context culture than in our own. Perhaps it is related to the Catholic idea that no sin is permanent, but that everyone can be given absolution. As someone who is often seen as a bit out of the mainstream in my own culture now, I feel more happy and respected among Latinos than among other North-Americans, which may seem ironic. Maybe our Puritan forebears were just too willing to banish you or burn you, whereas Catholics would tell you to confess your sin to a padre and keep on following your heart, as no one is beyond salvation or automatically damned. Starting to sound familiar?
So, even though our stereotype of Latinos might be that homophobia is rampant, my experience has been that, even if people don’t entirely approve, they are too polite to say anything, and their warmth and sense of respect for my “dignidad” outweighs anything else. In North American culture, it is far too easy to feel like a lonely dog waiting outside in the rain with your nose pressed to the panes, hoping someone will let you in and show you some warmth. People are disposable for all sorts of reasons in our culture. Not so in high-context cultures. In these cultures, it is much, much harder to get kicked out of the “familia.”
I think that this is the common ground where high-context cultures and Unitarian Universalism can most successfully meet. We all believe in the worth and dignity of every single person, no matter how flawed he or she might be.
And we do have much to learn from each other. Maybe people in other cultures could learn some things from us. I suppose that a little bit of efficiency and Puritan work ethic might not be such a bad thing, especially if you want to raise your standard of living. (And until recently, I would have said that our example of good government would have been a great inspiration to the world.) And traits such as our independence and our liberation from traditions we find constricting might be totally without value. But I would argue that, while we may want to be progressive, modern people, we must never lose sight of a sense of generosity and exuberance, and interconnectedness that more traditional cultures show us.
I hope we can appreciate other cultures, and try to look at our own with a more critical eye. And I hope we can grow ever more exuberant, generous, fun and caring. And I hope that we can bring all of these things to others in our local, as well as global, community. The world needs this now more than ever.
Let the drums play. Let the people dance and eat and drink and sing and be merry. Let us join hands and feel the warm of our simple humanity pulse from person to person, in joy, never sorrow.
And to this, let us say Amen!
©This sermon was written by Steve Farrington for the congregation of the First Universalist Church of Rochester, New York and was delivered on October 26, 2008. No part of this sermon may be copied without permission of the author.
Reverend Sally Hamlin speaking
Part of the preparation for my move to the Bay area five years ago to attend seminary included selling and packing up the home where I had lived for fifteen years. I worked on this methodically from the time I received my acceptance letter from Starr King School for the Ministry in December, until the day of my actual move in August. Sorting through possessions: keepsakes from my daughters’ early childhoods, old love letters written when I was newly infatuated, boxes of files and papers and unread books, old kitchen knickknacks- just lots and lots of stuff.
Each box was a stroll down memory lane, and I moved along this path slowly, not wanting to miss a thing. I wanted this transition, one of the biggest in my life, to be marked. I wanted to honor it and not let it pass without its due acknowledgement. A lot of life had occurred in that house, this place of childhoods, marital passages and deaths of family members, health challenges and career shifts. All of it was reflected in, not only the contents of the house, but in the sense of place of the house: the gardens I had built and designed, the huge messy maple tree out back that littered the yard with endless branches which fell when a strong wind blew, the deck off the back of the house where I had spent countless hours gazing upward, skyward, watching the wind move the clouds which came off the lake, listening to the animals, the squirrels and the birds, the buzzing insects that hummed in the deep heat of summer, and the rustle of the leaves of the huge trees that were like God’s own whisper to my soul.
I know within my body the ways the weather feels in Western New York. I can tell in my bones what the weather is planning even without looking at the barometer that stays near my front door. My body became the barometer in humid weather; it took on fluid like a dry thirsty cottonwood drinks in the first deep rain. In spring in Buffalo, the earth itself takes on a heady scent that reminds me that we walk upon a live underground world, supported by the pulse of Mother herself, her smell musky when she awakes after her long winter slumber.
I could predict thunderstorms, and there are some magnificent ones in here Western New York, by reading the patterns of the leaves in the trees; and I could forecast snowstorms by watching the way the clouds bank and form their mass: they huddle down low and dark.
Looking back at my memories of that place, and especially of how I depended upon the weather patterns for orienting myself, I am surprised that I did not predict that I would feel so displaced by my move to the West coast, where the weather patterns were all new to me. At times I felt a great sense of both sadness and bewilderment, that goes beyond missing family and friends, and that I framed as part of simply not knowing how the weather in the East Bay “worked”. I realize I had simply not learned to read the signs of the weather there in my first few seasons. The seasons are more subtle, the changes unpatterned and unpredictable to my emigrant eyes.
However, when I would speak about the disorientation I felt with native Californians, I was often met with blank stares, or with incredulous faces that implied something like: there is weather in Buffalo that you would miss?
There was one person who responded immediately and with compassion to my bewilderment. Rebecca Parker heard something beyond the words I was speaking and took the time to listen to my story of dislocation and displacement. She patiently explained the northern California seasons to me, taking me through each subtle shift in an imaginary year. She explained the weather by describing the colors of the hills and how they change from gold to emerald green, the seasons of the flowering plants and trees, how the air patterns move, and when and where the birds would appear.
When she did this, I felt as though I could finally consider this place as a home for me. I could imagine it to someday feel like something I could know, in my body, although at the time this knowing felt like a long ways away. Whether she knew it or not, Rebecca extended a very big kindness to me that day; she gave me hope that this place would one day feel like home.
Why is the sense of place so important to our sense of feeling at home? How and why do we use our sense of place to navigate our world? What is it that Rebecca Parker did that helped with my feelings of displacement?
Yi-Fu Tuan, a geographer at the University of Wisconsin at Madison, says that the sense of place and rootedness that people have increases proportionate to their experience of languaging within the place. He says that how a place is spoken about, described and named, and how a person is introduced to it will influence their connection to it. Language, he says, “is never neutral”1 and that “words have the general power to bring to light experiences that lie in the shadow or have receded into it, and the specific power to call places into being”.2
How does this information help us in our church community?
If it is a fact that almost 80% of new Unitarian Universalists come to our faith from some other religious tradition, then we can assume that most people come to us by choice. But it is necessary to consider that even though this is true, these so-called religious immigrants may still have some difficulty understanding the new ‘culture’ they find themselves in. New members may be suffering from a feeling of displacement, which is defined as “any movement or shift from a customary setting”.
People who are born and raised in our faith tradition have had the opportunity to name the landscape of Unitarian Universalism, so to speak. They have a familiarity with its symbols, rituals, traditions, language, and culture. Our religious ancestors created Unitarianism and Universalism by naming it, they languaged it. They called it into being. They brought to life something that did not exist before. Part of our heritage and what gives it such power is that many of our forebears also suffered and sacrificed for these beliefs, some of them with their lives. This profound commitment, in part, is what underlies and makes vivid the pictures of the stories of our faith tradition. Knowing these stories helps us have a sense of being part of something much larger than ourselves. When we light the chalice together on Sunday morning, we are instantly transported through sight, and words, and symbol across centuries and oceans, to our religious roots, and connected vibrantly to the web of life of which we are a part.
But even many life-long or old-timer Unitarian Universalists can unknowingly suffer the effects of displacement when their congregations shift and grow with the addition of new members.
The effects of displacement should not be underestimated, especially when it comes to religious identity. Two contemporary theologians (Nieman and Rogers) describe the impact of displacement thusly: “Displacement separates us from the patterns that have been central to us, the strategies that have helped us mark off who we are. . . it threatens the very core of what culture at its best seeks to provide. . . ways toward identity, belonging and action.”3
While these same theologians argue that we usually associate the effects of displacement with immigrants from other countries that come to North American culture either by choice or as a refugee from persecution, “displacement is a cultural issue of some considerable magnitude for native-born Americans as well. . . Americans no longer tend to live and die in the same place”, and “Middle class professionals have been described as the new migrant workers.”4
So even though you may have come to Unitarian Universalism from another faith tradition, where rituals, roles, and polity were clearly defined for you, it is likely that your previous religious experience no longer “works for you”, or you would not be here. You may have felt hurt by your tradition in some way, or been denied full access to its rituals or practice because of some core part of your being or identity, such as your gender or sexuality, for example.
If this is the case it may take you some time to feel at home here in Unitarian Universalism. You will have some work to do to heal your wounds. It will take some time, but we will help you.
Or, conversely, you may be one of the people who immediately felt at home once you attended a UU worship service. I have heard this from more than one person to know this is not an uncommon experience.
But it cannot be assumed that all people will immediately feel at home in a new congregation where, our UU ideals or tenets, our rituals and our roles, our polity and absence of creed and doctrine are new or different.
If we want to help new members or visitors feel welcomed and part of our congregation then the learning about Unitarian Universalism must take place with the understanding that how we language the experience for visitors and new members will have a huge impact upon them. It will influence their level of participation, their sense of belonging, and, most especially, it will influence how long people will stay with us, or, whether they decide early on, that the differences are too vast to navigate, and will require too much emotional, spiritual and psychological work on their part.
As Nieman and Rogers, the theologians quoted earlier, say, “as a private psychological wound like grief or depression, the effects of displacement can . . . easily remain hidden from others” and may even make it difficult for those suffering from the effects of displacement to recognize others around them who may be suffering from the same plight, thereby increasing feelings of isolation, rejection, and cause “available social resources for expressing and addressing displacement. . . unused.”5
What are the implications of this information for us as Unitarian Universalists who, as a religious group, have a higher percentage of visitors than other denominations, and yet have one of the lowest “stick around and join” rates?
The first thing we can do to assist in diminishing the power of displacement is to name it, to “draw this reality into the open and make it visible.”6 It is important for both the minister and for the congregation to have a sense of how disorienting cultural change can be for those who are experiencing it for the first time.
If you have come to us from another faith tradition, do you remember the first time you participated in a Unitarian Universalist worship service? If you identify as one who carries hidden wounds from other religious experiences, this recollection is critical. This will be the first step in not only feeling that you belong here, but it will crack open your heart and allow the loving healing community that is First Universalist to embrace you on your path to wholeness.
When we listen to one another’s spiritual journeys, sharing our stories with one another, we begin to create a bond that can deepen a tentative connection or cement an otherwise wavering one. We have begun the process of languaging a spiritual home together.
Part of this naming and listening is what “rounds out the task of attentiveness, testing our understanding by holding us accountable to others”(96). Such naming helps to begin to pave the path to reclaim a lost vision for those who are displaced, so that they can find in our church community a destination, a home, and thus, recover some sense of purpose, hope and belonging, building social capital along the way.7
We have much to learn about what shapes and strengthens our congregations. For those of us who have successfully navigated the journey from another faith tradition to Unitarian Universalism, we especially treasure our new found faith community. We value our polity and the freedom it provides.
Much like I have had to learn to read the signs of a new geographic weather pattern in order to feel a sense of place, home and belonging in California, we need to begin to offer one another a listening heart, much like Rebecca Parker did for me that afternoon,. By recognizing the longing that our visitors and seekers have for a true religious home where all of who they are is welcome, we can take the first step, provide a willingness to hear the tale of the traveler’s journey to help the wandering pilgrim find a home in our Unitarian Universalist congregation.
Today, about fifteen minutes after the service ends, and for the next few weeks the Membership Committee and I will be offering a series of gatherings that will begin this sacred dialogue of sharing our stories, of languaging one another into a sense of place. It is our hope that as we begin to practice intentional religious hospitality, that we will help others find in First Universalist, a place to call home.
We invite you along for the journey.
May it be so. Blessed Be. Amen.
©This sermon was written by Reverend Sally Hamlin for the congregation of the First Universalist Church of Rochester, New York and was delivered on October 19, 2008. No part of this sermon may be copied without permission of the author.
The Rev. Sally Hamlin speaking
When I was parenting teenagers a few years back, I recall more than one conversation that went something like this. I would say: “Well, I understand that you would not say/do/or participate in (fill in the blank with whatever topic), but from what I have seen and by your own admission, some of your friends do those things (or say those things, etc). So, you might want to consider who it is you choose to associate with. You do have a choice; I hope you will give this a little thought.”
And this is one way to frame our discussion about Association Sunday, which we celebrate today. It is all about choice. After all, we associate with one another, in this congregation, by actively choosing to do so. No one has legislated or demanded our participation. And we, the member congregations of the Unitarian Universalist Association, who are in covenant with one another, need Association Sundays to strengthen the bonds of common purpose among us. We need to bring our congregations together to pursue our mission of affirming “the inherent worth and dignity of every person”.
Association Sundays are a request by our UUA for all congregations to support, both spiritually and financially, the national work of the Asssociation. It is a day during which thousands of UUs across the nation simultaneously celebrate our shared commitment to our faith.
Today is the second Association Sunday that our UUA has organized to help support its mission to Growing Our Spirit. This means ‘our group spirit, the human spirit, the holy spirit, the spirit of life, the spirit of love’.1 The monies collected today will not be used for the general operations of our association. Rather they will be directed towards projects focused on deepening our Shared Ministry as part of the Now Is the Time! Campaign.
Last year’s Association Sunday funded, in part, the Time magazine ad series on Unitarian Universalism.
This is the first year that First Universalist is participating in Association Sunday. So congratulations are in order! Because once we decide to associate with one another through our covenant, we are creating the beloved community which we have visioned together, and in which all are worthy of participation.
We are living in extraordinary times, with headlines that seem as if they are coming from another planet, so bizarrely they barrage us, with warnings of more dire things yet to come. Our financial market is in complete upheaval. Our very foundations are cracked and weakening.
The frame we have used to determine what helps us feel safe has now been turned upside down. For generations we heard the mantra: live within your means, save for your future, invest wisely, take care of yourself now so you can have a healthy and long life.
It is time to think about doing the things we always do, the things we have always done, in a new way.
We need to ask ourselves what it is that will help us through these upheavals. What role does our congregation, our beloved community, play in our sense of security? How can I contribute to strengthening this relationship, when my own resources seem to be dwindling day by day? What can I possibly contribute to Association Sunday when I don’t know if my cash is secure?
Well, first of all, you should know this: You are more important to this community than your money is. I will repeat that: You are more important to this community than your money is. This has always been and will always be, true.
At the same time, we know that money is needed to bring the community we vision into life. As Janus Mary pointed out last week in her offertory words, money, in and of itself, is neutral, it has no ethical denotation. The only meaning money has is the meaning that we give it.
Secondly, it is important to know what it is that will be funded by Association Sunday. Fifty percent will support Lay Theological Education programs. Congregations, districts, and seminaries can apply for grants to create programs which focus on spiritual and theological deepening.
The other half will be divided among three initiatives that support Excellence in Ministry programs, including scholarships for seminary students and support for our minsters of color.
Earlier we sang:
Blessed Spirit of my Life, give me strength through stress and strife.
Help me live with dignity; let me know serenity.
Fill me with a vision, clear my mind of fear and confusion.
When my thoughts flow restlessly, let peace find a home in me.
The words of our hymn today could not be more appropriate words for our current times, I think. We sing our prayer to find strength to deal with all that is before us, we pray for dignity, for serenity. We pray for clear vision, for freedom from fear. And we recognize that when our monkey mind takes over and we spin instead of settle, we sing our prayer that peace finds its home within us.
And sometimes, especially right now when our financial institutions teeter dangerously over the brink of the abyss, threatening to disappear with our carefully saved assets- if we were among those fortunate enough to put anything aside- we find a new opportunity to make a difference.
But in times of stress and fear, we tend to forget the basics about what is important.
I have had conversations with several of you who are very concerned about your financial future. Some of you retired with well-planned retirement funds in place, but are now considering returning to work, given your recent loss of capital. You wonder if your investments will have time to recover from these losses before you will need to draw on them.
Some of you were already living pretty close to the bone. You are now worried about what will be next. Will your health benefits be cut back? Will your premiums increase to the point of unaffordability? Will you need to find ways to help adult children raise their children, your grandchildren, as their jobs are lost and incomes halved?
In times such as these it is easy to slip into the mind set of ‘Scare-city’ as political comedian Swami Beyondananda names it. Swami B calls us to, instead, declare ABunDance for All. He says we need to turn to thinking of wealth for the whole, instead of wealth down the hole, we need to turn to concern for justice, and turn away from the concern for ‘just-us’. We need to live by the Golden Rule, instead of the rule of gold. We need to live in a state of ‘Emerge ‘n See’, instead of residing in a state of emergency.
This is the time when we begin to realize we need to weave a web of mass construction, as Swami says, and imagining a new world to replace our sick one, tell one another of our visions for the future, playing the game of Extreme Planetary Makeover. Speak of our fears, but work to change the way we see these times. 2
What can we do to change our perspective, to move from survival to ‘thrival’ (Swami B)? Well, Association Sunday gives an opportunity to do just that, with a gift of our financial support.
Let me explain why I will be donating $100 to Association Sunday today, and why I have asked your board of trustees to consider making donations of $50 or more.
It has to do with stewardship, and putting my money where my mouth is, and walking the path of faith instead of fear.
When I was in seminary, I took a class called Sociology of Religion. I was challenged by my professor’s claim that while Unitarian Universalists were among the wealthiest of all denominations, our financial commitment to our denomination was among the lowest. I was shocked by this information. I didn’t know who he was talking about, but it wasn’t the UUs I knew! The UUs I knew were generous and committed. We were proud of Unitarian Universalism. We found ways to live out the principles of our faith in the world by working on and donating to many good causes- ACLU, Save the Whales, Doctors Without Borders, National Public Radio-what was he talking about?
Well, after doing my own research I came to the sad conclusion that Professor Baggett was correct. Proportionally speaking, UUs, in general, give a smaller percentage of their net worth to support their faith tradition than others do. In fact, we were second to the bottom on the list.
But, still, something did not sit right with me about this. I thought and thought about it until finally I came up with this theory. While others commit their resources to their faith communities with the desire and trust that their faith community will represent their values in the world, as UUs we often spread our resources out, over, and among, many worthy causes, and we make our congregation and our UUA only one of the many to which we pledge our funds.
This was a light bulb moment for me. It was, in the words used by those who give proportionally more of their net income to their faith community, a “Come to Jesus Moment!”
This got me thinking: if I truly believed in the saving message of my chosen faith community, then it was time to put my money where my beliefs are: in you, in one another, in Unitarian Universalism.
My new plan of giving, or stewardship focused on my faith, has completely reinvented the way I think about giving in my life. I now think about how I can be a steward of my faith and my religious community, and my beliefs at the same time. I think about how the money I have to give can be used within the Unitarian Universalist world, and I give until it feels good. My colleague, the Reverend Victoria Weinstein says this about stewardship: “Stewardship of the 21st century is not about providing services and a superior product to consumers, it is about fostering worshipful hearts and reverent souls who love what the church represents so much that they begin to live their lives in accordance with its ideals”.3
I now tithe to support Unitarian Universalism. Some years this has been a full ten percent of my net income. Some years, it has been much less. I certainly did not start with anywhere near ten percent. I started small, and waited to see what difference my focused giving made in my life. I was concerned that I would feel a bit too stretched. And I <i>was</i> stretched. But not in the way I expected. By making my regular tithe to Unitarian Universalism, and by redirecting other monies I might ordinarily have focused other causes, I was finding that I was feeling spiritually stretched, as in expanded. As in, strengthening my belief in others, strengthening my belief in my belief. Tithing has helped me keep despondency, hopelessness and powerlessness at bay.
Tithing has also given me a new way to look at my faith. It has deepened my commitment to working with others to change the world by living the life I say I believe in. Tithing as a spiritual practice allows me to feel more deeply connected to all, more embedded within the interdependent web of all existence. It helps me see myself as only one part of all that exists. And it helps me feel that I have something to say in the face of all that seems outside my control, and that is this: I choose to associate with you. I choose to associate with others who can make a difference, and I choose to make my association count, with my time, with my life, with my resources, with my heart and with my soul.
And this, for me, is enough. And this, for me, is just and good. And it gives me great comfort to know that my financial support of our faith is one way I can express spiritual congruency. Will you join me and your Trustees today in supporting Association Sunday, with your best offering?
If you did not get a chance to place your offering in the plate as it passed the first time, there is still time to do so now; you can give your envelope to an usher on your way out after our Postlude.
In closing, the words of the 19th century Unitarian theologian and minister, William Ellery Channing come to mind. Let me share them with you:
To live content with small means;
To seek elegance rather than luxury, and refinement rather than fashion;
To be worthy, not respectable, and wealthy, not rich;
To study hard, think quietly, talk gently, act frankly;
To listen to stars and birds, to babes and sages, with open heart;
To bear all cheerfully, do all bravely, await occasions, hurry never.
To let the spiritual, unbidden and unconscious, grow up through the common.
This will be my symphony.
May it be so. Amen.
©This sermon was written by Reverend Sally Hamlin for the congregation of the First Universalist Church of Rochester, New York and was delivered on October 12, 2008. No part of this sermon may be copied without permission of the author.
The Reverend Sally Hamlin speaking
(What follows here is the text of the first sermon preached at our church, on October 4, 1908 by the Reverend Arthur W. Grose. The Reverend Hamlin spoke extensively from this sermon.)
Psalm 96:6. Strength and beauty are in his sanctuary.
We meet to-day for the first time in our new house of worship. We must defer for a few weeks the formal dedication of this temple to the great purposes it was built to serve and we trust that before that day comes the building in all its parts will reach a degree of perfection and completeness in detail not possible to-day. It seems wisest however to begin now the use of at least such portions of the church as are ready for occupancy and it is inevitable that our thoughts shall centre around the fact that we are again permitted to dwell in a church home of our own.
Some months ago in looking over the sermon preached by Dr. Saxe at the rededication of the old church in April 1871, I was struck with the appropriateness of the words of his text for this occasion as well as for that similar one so many years ago. This thought was confirmed when I discovered that Dr. Montgomery, while using a different text, struck the same note of strength and beauty in his sermon at the dedication of the First Church, November 23, 1847. Surely if there are any two words that fitly characterize our present house of worship they are these same words—strength and beauty. I am confident that to you, many of
Read more…